latest Reviews and articles
- Food / Wine
- Life and Style
- Carpet Cleaner in Islington
- London to Paris 2 return tickets (28feb-05mar
- Waiter, Waitress, Barman, Kitchen Porter Wanted in London
- After school English speaking nanny position in Parsons Green
Charlie Hebdo went up in smoke!
On the night of 1-2 November, the Parisian headquarters of Charlie Hebdo, a satirical paper with a circulation of around 75,000 copies each week, was burned down and reduced to ashes. The paper is no stranger to incendiary activities, having already been attacked and taken to court in 2006 for the publication of Danish cartoons portraying the prophet Mohammed.
This latest incident was provoked by a special edition called « Sharia Hebdo », supposedly put together by Mohammed as editor in chief. The front page of the special edition features a cartoon of Mohammed saying « 100 lashes if you don’t die of laughter ». Perhaps not surprisingly (standing up for free speech or pointless provocation of a minority?) not everybody saw the funny side of the story.
The Charlie Hebdo website was also hijacked and its Facebook page was flooded with outraged messages and threats from fundamentalist groups. The website was rapidly disabled but the weekly Nouvel Observateur subsequently received a press release from Akincilar, a Turkish group, stating « Charlie Hebdo is now our target after this attack to our religious values ».
The media establishment counter-attack
The Charlie Hebdo team took refuge at the editorial offices of Libération, a left-wing daily, and the Sharia special, thanks to this God given advertising campaign, rapidly sold out. Charlie Hebdo journalists replied to the attacks by creating a new blog where they take the p**ss out of themselves by saying that they had not even been clever enough to schedule a bigger print run of the offending edition. They, at least, still have a sense of humour.
All the great and good of the French media came out in support of Charlie Hebdo in a well-organised parade of self-righteousness. Libération, presumably having notified ‘les pompiers’ in advance, even published cartoons featuring Mohammed on its website. Politicians lined up to denounce this crime against freedom of expression. Social networks such as Facebook registered great waves of support for Charlie (but not many people left their home address).
So, were they right to publish? Maybe German newspapers were full of similar ‘humour’ about Jews in Nazi Germany? When does one person’s humour become somebody else’s offensive racism? In an atmosphere of political and religious tension, with the burqa issue still not far from the headlines, was it right to put out an issue that Le Pen supporters probably found funnier than Charlie’s traditional readership base?
Maybe Charlie should approach the Front National for funds to re-build their headquarters if their insurers refuse to pay up?
Satirical Web Article
Please note that FranceInLondon has now moved without leaving a forwarding address. (you never know!)