latest Reviews and articles
CHAMPAGNE DEUTZ – THE QUIET PLAYER ON THE WORLD STAGE - Within the UK Deutz Champagne is considered one of Champagnes...
Where to celebrate Bastille Day in London - Many restaurants and bars in London have chosen to embrace...
How do you chose a dentist in London? - There are so many dentists in London. How do I choose?
The Brioche de Noel Pasquier arrives in London at last - In this festive season, there will be many food options to enjoy...
MAGAZINE
-
Children
-
Culture
-
Decoration
-
Economy/Politics
-
Education
-
Fashion
-
Food / Wine
-
Health
-
Holidays
-
Jobs
-
Law
-
Life and Style
-
Property
-
Sport
Device converter
Weather
Classified ads
- 3 bedroom flat to rent
- Football agent looking for talented players
- Fundraisers for a charity
- Looking to have French-English language exchange
Recently added
articles > Health events

Alert: Should women still be taking the pill?
Since the introduction of the birth-control pill in the 60s, it has been a symbol of sexual freedom and of women’s control over their bodies. But this freedom has a price: our health.
There is a misconception that clouds our thinking around the contraceptive pill. It's omnipresence in women's lives has lead to a belief that it is almost natural and stopped us from considering the potential harm it can do.
In France, women have accused the contraceptive pills of being directly responsible for their heart attacks. An anti-acne drug often used as a contraceptive, better known as “Diane 35”, has caused the death of four women. These scandals have left women without answers to one crucial question: should they still be taking the contraceptive pill?
"Nobody, nobody, nobody should take the 3rd and 4th generation pills »
On the 14th of December 2012, Marion Larat has filed a lawsuit against Bayer, alleging that she suffered a cerebrovascular accident as a result of taking a pill produced by the German laboratory (Meliane). At only 25 years of age, she is no longer in control of her right-hand and regularly suffers from epilepsy. “Nobody, nobody, nobody should take the 3rd and 4th generation pills” she warns.
Since then, more than 14 victims of contraceptive pills in France have filed a lawsuit against the laboratories Bayer, Effik, MSD France, Biogaran and against the French National Agency for Medicine Security.
Why are they dangerous?
All contraceptive pills increase the risks of:
- Thrombophlebitis: formation of blood clots
- Pulmonary embolism: a blockage of the main artery of the lung or one of its branches by blood clots that have travelled from elsewhere in the body through the bloodstream.
- Myocardial infarction: commonly known as a heart attack, it results from the interruption of blood supply to a part of the heart, causing heart cells to die.
- Cerebrovascular accident (CVA): commonly known as a stroke, it is the rapid loss of brain function due to disturbance in the blood supply to the brain.
It is during the first year that the risks linked to the birth control pill are at their highest. Combining the contraceptive pill with smoking, especially after 35 is also very dangerous for women’s health.
Why have the 3rd and 4th generations pills been prescribed so much?
Even though the notice mentions the risks linked to these contraceptives, one in three of all females of reproductive age take the pill in the UK. Why such a widespread use of birth controls pills if they are so risky?
- The pills of 3rd and 4th generation have fewer side effects.To avoid larger breasts, weight gain, nausea or emotional sensitivity, women take these pills. Doctors recommend them especially to younger girls, arguing that they will be able to start contraception with a lighter product.
-
Buying the pill is too easy? In France, most women consult a gynaecologist before taking the pill, but most of the time GP’s also prescribe it, especially in the UK. Furthermore, some pharmacies sell it without prescription in case of emergency.
- There’s not enough prevention: The risky side effects might be enough to deter some women from taking birth-control pills, but many women are just not aware of them. The birth control pill has always been a good choice of contraception for women but is not always the safest option available and doctors or pharmacists do not do enough prevention.
Stopping the pill could be more risky
The London-based European Medicines Agency (EMA) said that blood-clot risk with all birth control pills was “very small” although it was higher for third-and-fourth generation ones. “There is no reason for any woman to stop taking her contraceptive. If a woman has concerns, she can discuss this with her doctor” stated the EMA.
For gynaecologists, stopping the pill would result in an increase in unintended pregnancies, which present far more risks of blood clots and heart attacks than taking the pill.
Number of thromboembolic accidents amongst 100 000 women (French National Agency of Medicine Security).
Without birth-control pills: 5 to 10
With 1st and 2nd generation pills: 20
With 3rd and 4th generation pills: 40
During pregnancy: 60
In an attempt to control the situation, the French Health Minister, Marisol Touraine, asked the EU to limit the use of pills of 3rd and 4th generation and said the government would stop reimbursing prescription costs of third and fourth generation pills.
Nevertheless gynaecologists stress the fact that pregnant women are twice more likely to have thromboembolic accidents than women who take the pill. Furthermore, they consider it would be far worse to stop the use of this method of contraception and see an increase in abortions.
What should women do?
It is advisable to:
- Avoid taking birth control pills, especially 3rd and 4th generation, for non-contraceptive reasons, such as menstrual regulation or acne.
- Increase awareness concerning the pill’s dangers.
- Encourage having proper gynaecological examinations prior to taking birth-control.
- avoid taking the pill if you are a smoker
What alternatives are on offer?
Implants or the Cézarette (oestrogen-free, progestogen-only oral contraceptive pill) are the only hormonal contraceptives that do not present any kind of risks, but they have very strong side effects such as weight gain and/or migraines.
The modern intrauterine device (IUD or Coil) is another alternative to the pill, but is not recommended for women that have an instable sexual relationship. The IUD is a form of birth control in which a small “T”-shaped device, containing either copper or progesterone is inserted into the uterus. Nevertheless the IUD can be risky: 2 women out of 10 000 suffer from blood clots and risks of infection exists, which can lead to sterility in some very rare cases.
In conclusion, the pill may not be very dangerous but it does increase risks of thrombophlebitis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accidents. Women should be more aware of these risks when making descisions about which contraceptive method they will use, but first and foremost gynaecologist should keep a constant eye on women’s health to prevent accidents.
Differences between pills
All contraceptive pills include the cobination of progestogen that blocks ovulation, and oestrogen, that eases its consumption. The word 'generation' refers to the evolution of its composition and the risks vary in function of the different generations.
Generation of Pill |
First |
Second |
Third |
Fourth |
On sale from |
1960 |
1970-1980 |
1990 |
1990 |
Composition |
Strong dose of oestrogens and progestogen (norethisterone, norgestrienone)
|
Progestogen (levonorgrestrel ou norgestrel) and oestrogen |
A combination of three new derivatives of progestogen, which are desogestrel, gestoden, norgestimate. |
A new kind of progestogen, the drospirenon |
Side Effects |
Breast expansion, nausea, migraines, and vascular problems. |
Slightly reduced effects than the first generation pill |
They are meant to limit the side effects of the 1rst and 2nd generation |
They are meant to limit the side effects of the 1rst and 2nd generation |
Risks |
Small increase, compared to women who don't take the pill, in the risk of developing a blood clots in a vein in the leg (deep vein thrombosis or in the lungs (pulmonary embolism) or in an artery causing a stroke or a heart attack. Small increase in the risk of being diagnosed with breat cancer. |
Small increase, compared to women who don't take the pill in the risk of developing a blood clots in a vein in the leg (deep vein thrombosis or in the lungs (pulmonary embolism) or in an artery causing a stroke or a heart attack. Small increase in the risk of being diagnosed with breat cancer. |
Higher risks of blood clots compared to the two previous generations. Small increase in the risk of being diagnosed with breast cancer compared to women who don't take the pill.
|
Higher risks of blood clots compared to the two previous generations. Small increase in the risk of being diagnosed with breast cancer compared to women who don't take the pill. |
Pills on sale in the UK |
Binovum, Brevinor, Loestrin 20, Loestrin 30, Norimin, Norinyl-1, Ovysmen, Synphase, Trinovum |
Microgynon, Logynon, Logynon ED, Microgynon 30, Microynon 30 ED, Ovranette, |
Cilest, Femodene, Femodene ED, Femodette, Marvelon, Mercilon, Sunya, Triadene, |
Yasmin |
Pills on sale in France | Triella | Minidril, Adepal, Trinordiol | Carlin, Cilest, Cycleane, Desobel, Edenelle, EE/désogestrel Biogaran, EE/gestodène Actavis, EE/gestodène Arrow, EE/gestodène Biogaran, EE/gestodène EG, EE/gestodène Teva, EE/gestodène Ranbaxy, EE/gestodène Ratiopharm, EE/gestodène Sandoz, EE/gestodène Zentiva, EE/gestodène Zydus, EE/gestodène Winthrop, Efezial, Effiprev, Felixita, Harmonet, Meliane, Melodia, Mercilon, Minesse, Minulet, Moneva, Perleane, Phaeva, Sylviane, Triafemi, Tricilest, Triminulet, Varnoline. | Bélanette, Convuline, Biogaran, Drospirenone Ethinylestradiol Biogaran continu, Jasmine, Jasminelle, Jasminelle continu, Rimendia, Yaz. |
NB: The Dianette (Diane 35 in France) pill is used for severe acne, abnormal hair growth and also provides contraception for women, but it should not be used solely as a contraceptive. Dianette tablets contain two active ingredients, cyproterone acetate (anti-androgens, which are male hormones produced also by women) and ethinylestradiol. This anti-acne which also serves as a contraceptive present a higher risk of developing blood clots in a vein, in the leg(deep vein thrombosis) or in the lungs (pulmonary embolism) or a blood clot in an artery causing a stroke or a heart attack. This risk is even higher for women who smoke or who are obese. There is also an increase in the diagnose of breast cancer. Dianette has been withdrawned of the market in France because of its high risks.
Zone Tag
bonne maman jam, ta douleur, health, chanteroy, Interior Designer, Vincent Cassel, Monin Sirops, Health, Tom McCarthy, boules tournament, French election, Gabrielle, Phlebologists, London Fashion Week, 1973, Rochambeau, Culture, la Trouvaille, release, Jewish Book Week, london, 5.55, je suis charlie, e-change,
COMMENTS:
12/05/2014 - blackice01 said :
Dear Adrienne,
I would ask in future for you to write articles with more balance. Nobody wants women to have adverse effects whilst using contraception, especially not dangerous ones, and that is obvious. But the relative risk is actually very very small, and the statement by the ANSM has over-estimated the risk. The European Medicines Agency has come to the conclusion that the benefits do outweigh the risks of prescribing, and that the research the ANSM used over-estimates risks compared to almost any other current literature. A useful link by the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare is available here: http://www.fsrh.org/pdfs/CEUStatementDianette.pdf.
To put things into context you are six times more likely to have a VTE from pregnancy and 3-6 times more likely to be raped than to suffer a serious adverse effect from an COCP. Dianette when used for Acne can seem unnecessary but many other 3rd and 4th gen contraceptives are essential for many women.
Apologies if this seems like an emotive analogy, but articles that play up the risk of COCP can and have had a major effect on women's health, to a far greater scale then the handful of deaths over several decades from the COCP.
It also put's a significant strain on struggling healthcare systems to pick up the pieces (unintended pregnancies and resulting adoptions and TOP) and fallout from individuals that may already be concerned about the safety profile of contraceptives.
Yours Sincerely,
Jonathan,
Student Doctor on rotation in Gynaecology&Obstetrics
23/05/2013 - capybook said :
je veux savoire si la pilule logynone et forte pour plutard. est ce que je peut avoir une grossesse normale?.
06/02/2013 - adrienne.benassy said :
Dear Chantal,
The information concerning the pills came from the NHS's website. Nevertheless I have added to the table the French pills on sale and put the most common British ones on the market (source: netdoctor.co.uk).
Best regards,
Adrienne Benassy
05/02/2013 - chantal.dewast said :
Good article. But who wrote it?
as none of the pills mentioned are French or English pills...not very practicle for your readers!
LEAVE A COMMENT